The ideological founder of Pakistan ,
Allama Iqbal, traced his ancestry to the Brahmins of Kashmir. As he envisaged
only North-western India as
part of Pakistan , another
Kashmiri Pandit delivered it exact same by sundering the eastern half into Bangladesh in
1971. That was P N Haksar, Indira Gandhi’s backroom boy. Of course, goes
without saying Gandhi too had Kashmiri Pandit lineage, as does the present
Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir
Omar Abdullah. Just shows how intensely intertwined the Kashmiri Pandits and
Kashmiri, indeed South Asian politics are, or have been.
Yet, Our Moon Has Blood Clots by
Rahul Pandita remains intensely personal. Though the lightness with which
Pandita wears his emotions in no measure lightens the travails of a community
reduced to being refugees in their own land.
To a generation fed on the
association of Srinagar
with Hazratbal and Charar-e-Sharif, Rubia and Mirwaiz, the author introduces
the Srinagar of Kshir Bhawani and Shankaracharya, Durgashaptapati and Rishis,
Shaivism and the week long Shivratri festival. The Brahmin lineage of Kashmir,
only a figment now – a brutalized one at that – is established by the author
without a trace of malice or revivalism.
The author shows subtlety and
fortitude in bringing out the tormenting internal conflict. From the
difficulties of first day under Jammu heat barely 300 kms from the valley, to
the charade of refugee rations, to the darkness of tracking obituaries daily,
Pandita manages to bring out the Pandit’s struggle to keep body and soul
together, without schmaltz.
The exodus of Kashmiri Pandits
might have happened in 1990, but the build up had begun much earlier. It is
this story of Kashmir that Pandita focuses on.
Of how while growing up, his cricket team was called India
and that of his friend Tariq ,
Pakistan . Of
how as early as 1983, shouts of Pakistan Zindabad rented the stands during an
India-West Indies match in Srinagar .
Of how, for a Yasin Malik slapped by a Hindu teacher for writing Azadi on the
classroom wall, there was a Rehman defiling the image of Saraswati. Of how,
much before the Army rapes began, the Pandit was being lampooned – see a pandit,
ride a pandit – and shot. Of how, much before grievances over encounters, not a
single person got convicted in the hundreds of cases of Pandit killings. Of how, the whole brutalization process has only been matched by bureaucratic ingenuity
of governments that have done everything to add to the woes, short of disowning
the community.
It is remarkable how the
author has compartmentalized the personal. While on a professional assignment,
Pandita visits the Kshir Bhawani temple but calls the pilgrimage Mecca . It must take
courage to see the present day Kashmir through
the eyes of a Muslim cab driver after having suffered what the author did. Just
once Pandita’s emotions betray him – when he visits his home, and finds onions
on the shelf where once stood his books. He seethes, he fumes, and the
diligently worn mask of detachment unravels a little. That’s when the idea that
the exile could be permanent hits home. That’s when Wandhama, Sangrampora, and
Nandimarg start to get loaded with meaning that is political.
Yet the composure returns as swiftly. The author brings in the fact of a Namazi doctor once saving his mother, or friend-turned-militant Latif Lone doing it earlier. Strangely, Pandita even slips in a paragraph on
What happened in Kashmir was a meticulously planned ethnic cleansing. Our Moon Has Blood Clots cuts through the secular myth that commoners had no role in the act. But
in his fortitude, Pandita does not use the word even once. He uses the word
ghetto for the first and last time on the second last page only. He ends the narrative
with a letter to his brother Ravi’s friend Irshad who is now a college teacher
in Srinagar . Telling him he shall return permanently sometime, and asks him to call if in
receipt of the letter. Did Irshad call back? I would wager he did not. Which means
Pandita’s – and the Pandit’s – wish to return might remain just a wish. Forever
perhaps. For, that’s where the politics begins.
As a second generation Kashmiri Pandit, after the exodus, the book offers a valuable insight as to what has transpired in the valley for the past 22 years and how situation still remains the same. The issue remains hardly ever discussed in any KP family for many reasons, but I feel that it is because they do not want to transfer the hate to the next generation.
ReplyDeleteI totally agree with the you that Rahul has been completely detached emotionally in his memoir but this gives him some sort of authenticity to his account. People may have trouble believing, but what happened was in fact an act of ethnic cleansing which began in 1947. The analogy of this can be drawn from what happened to Parsis in Persia.
abhishek, this is really well written, esp how you noted the details. Didn't realise you were such well aware of and interested in Kashmir issue. We need another conversation soon. Very soon :)
ReplyDelete