SOUTH
block mandarins have expressed concern at Mumbai terror attack mastermind, and UN designated terrorist Hafiz
Saed joining politics. A Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson termed it an
attempt by Saed to cover his blood stained hands with ballot ink.
“After killing with bullets, he is trying to hide behind ballot”
is how MEA saw it. But is it that detrimental or disturbing a
development? How has recent Pakistani experience been?
A
decade and a half ago, another rabid maulana – Fazl-ur-Rahman –
burst onto Pakistani political scene. Leading the Muttahida
Majlis-e-Amal (MMA), a conglomeration of Islamic parties, Rahman gave
a real scare to mainstream parties and became the principal
opposition in the 2002 general elections. And then democracy took
over. In the last election in 2013, Rahman's party commanded a mere
3.2 per cent of popular vote, and has only 15 members in Pakistan's
National Assembly. In between he has aligned with a spectrum as broad
in its ideological sweep as left of centre PPP, and right of centre
PML(N). Similarly, General Musharraf of Kargil fame became amenable
to dialogue with India only after relinquishing uniform. Compulsions
of even a stagemanaged election impacted Chief Executive Musharraf to
a level that it was under him that we came close to resolving
Siachen.
Global
experience too suggests that exercise of democracy does wonders to
the creed of violence. The first time Hamas openly condemned
Holocaust was in 2008, a year after it came to power in Gaza strip.
Its ideological parent Muslim Brotherhood distanced itself from Al
Qaeda and ISIS only after coming to power through a democratic
election post Arab spring. Ulster Unionist David Trimble led Orange
marches through Catholic neighoburhoods in 1995. One election changed
him so much that he went in for talks with rival Sinn Fein, picked up
a Peace Nobel for the Good Friday Accord, and by 2005 was annoying
the orange order by participating in the funeral of a Catholic youth
killed in an IRA bombing.
Latest
ouster of Nawaz Sharif means that the Hydra-headed Pakistani state,
with its non-state actors thrown in, is not going to become a place
worth talking to anytime soon. Between the strenthened military and
the nutheads of Saed kinds, India has little leverage left with the
recalcitrant neighbour. So
here is the deal. Welcome Saed into politics and let democracy,
howsoever shallow in Pakistan, assimilate the terrorist. The
elixir of democracy has its ways of making strange bedfellows. The
aphrodisiac of power softens, not harden, the ideological edges.
A child of Zia ul Haq like Sharif, Saed has openly batted for Punjabi as Pakistan's national language and not Urdu. His party – Milli Muslim League - has pledged
to implement the ideology of Pakistan in accordance with the 1973
Constitution, and the vision of the Quaid-i-Azam and Allama Iqbal.
The Consitution was the product of an avowed socialist Zulfikar Ali
Bhutto. Jinnah in his August 11, 1947, speech wanted a Pakistan where
Hindus won't be Hindus, Muslims won't be Muslims. Iqbal wrote “Hai
Ram Ke Naam Pe Hindostan Ko Naaz,' and more famously “Saare Jahan
Se Accha Hindostan Hamara.” And you thought a terrorist can't be confused.
Well, strains of falling between two democratic stools are already
showing up. If
the Indian state is sharp, we should only wish him Allah-speed!
No comments:
Post a Comment